R0056/2026-04-01/C001/SRC01
Stanford sycophancy study published in Science (March 2026)
Source
| Field |
Value |
| Title |
Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence |
| Publisher |
Science (AAAS) |
| Author(s) |
Stanford computer scientists |
| Date |
March 2026 |
| URL |
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec8352 |
| Type |
Research paper (peer-reviewed) |
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
Low risk |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Published in Science, one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed journals. Underwent rigorous review process. |
| Relevance |
Directly measures the phenomenon claimed — AI affirmation rates compared to humans. |
| Bias flags |
No significant bias concerns identified. The study tested 11 models across multiple scenarios, reducing selection bias. |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC01-E01 |
AI models affirm users 49% more often than humans across 11 LLMs |