Skip to content

R0056/2026-04-01/C001

Claim: AI models affirm users' views approximately 49% more often than humans do.

BLUF: The claim is accurate. A Stanford study published in Science (March 2026) tested 11 major LLMs and found they affirmed users' actions 49% more often than humans on average.

Probability: Almost certain (95-99%) | Confidence: High


Summary

Entity Description
Claim Definition Claim text, scope, status
Assessment Full analytical product with reasoning chain
ACH Matrix Evidence x hypotheses diagnosticity analysis
Self-Audit ROBIS-adapted 5-domain audit

Hypotheses

ID Hypothesis Status
H1 The claim is accurate as stated Supported
H2 The claim is partially correct or correct with caveats Inconclusive
H3 The claim is materially wrong Eliminated

Searches

ID Target Results Selected
S01 Stanford sycophancy study in Science 10 3

Sources

Source Description Reliability Relevance
SRC01 Stanford/Science sycophancy study (2026) High High

Revisit Triggers

  • Science paper retraction or correction
  • Replication studies with different figures
  • Methodological critiques published in peer-reviewed venues