Skip to content

R9990/2026-03-20/C001/SRC02

Research R9990 — STAR interview neurodivergent impact
Run 2026-03-20
Claim C001
Search S05
Result S05-R01
Source SRC02

PMC — Access to Employment: Autistic, Neurodivergent and Neurotypical Hiring Experiences

Source

Field Value
Title Access to employment: A comparison of autistic, neurodivergent and neurotypical adults' experiences of hiring processes in the United Kingdom
Publisher PMC / Frontiers
Author(s) Multiple (academic research team)
Date 2023 (recruitment 2019-2020)
URL https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10375005/
Type Peer-reviewed research paper

Summary

Dimension Rating
Reliability High
Relevance High
Bias: Missing data Low risk
Bias: Measurement Some concerns
Bias: Selective reporting Low risk
Bias: Randomization N/A
Bias: Protocol deviation N/A
Bias: COI/Funding Low risk

Rationale

Dimension Rationale
Reliability Peer-reviewed, published in academic journal, mixed-methods design with n=377, statistical analysis with reported significance levels.
Relevance Directly compares interview experiences across autistic, neurodivergent, and neurotypical groups. Identifies behavioral question challenges and episodic memory difficulties.
Bias flags Sample is predominantly white, highly educated, and employed — may not represent the full neurodivergent population. Self-selected recruitment through autism and neurodiversity organizations may skew toward those with stronger opinions. Measurement concern: self-reported experiences rather than objective performance measures.

Evidence Extracts

Evidence ID Summary
SRC02-E01 Interview experience ratings significantly lower for autistic candidates (M=2.21) vs neurotypical (M=3.13), p<0.001
SRC02-E02 Autistic participants report episodic memory difficulties and struggle with open-ended behavioral questions