C001 — OSS CI Adoption Rate Around 40% — Self-Audit¶
Contents¶
Process Audit (Analytical Domains)¶
| Domain | Rating | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation Consistency | Pass | All four hypotheses were evaluated against the same evidence base. H1 (40% is correct) and H2 (higher than 40%) were assessed against the same empirical studies without preferential treatment. H3 (str |
| Synthesis Fairness | Pass | The synthesis gave appropriate weight to the two strong academic sources (Hilton et al., Mons/Radboud paper) while correctly noting the JetBrains survey's methodological limitations. The vendor-neutra |
Source-Back Verification¶
Sources verified: 4
Discrepancies¶
- minor at https://arxiv.org/html/2602.14572v3
- Assessment claims: The Mons/Radboud paper reports that 'CI/CD is widely adopted by the most popular projects'
- Source actually says: The paper cites Hilton et al. (2016) who 'observed that CI/CD is widely adopted by the most popular projects, with an increase in the adoption of CI/CD over time' — this is a citation of Hilton et al.'s finding, not an independent finding of the Mons/Radboud paper itself.