Skip to content

SRC009 — https://konvu.com/compare/semgrep-vs-codeql

Contents

Metadata

Field Value
URL https://konvu.com/compare/semgrep-vs-codeql
Authors Konvu (vendor producing triage tools)
Date 2026-03-16

Content Summary

Technical comparison of CodeQL and Semgrep SAST tools drawing on academic benchmarks. Key data: CodeQL FPR 68.2%, Semgrep FPR 74.8% on OWASP Benchmark. Combined four tools detect only 38.8% of real-world vulnerabilities. Custom Semgrep rules improved detection to 44.7%. CodeQL adoption between 10-30% across languages.

Reliability: Medium

Well-sourced vendor comparison citing academic papers but from a company selling SAST triage tools.

Relevance: High

Provides specific false positive rates and detection accuracy data for major SAST tools, plus CodeQL adoption rates.

Bias Assessment

Domain Rating Rationale
Missing Data Some concerns Academic benchmarks only test Semgrep Community Edition, not the commercial Pro Engine.
Measurement Low risk Cites specific academic studies with named authors and publication venues.
Selective Reporting Some concerns Concludes by noting triage is the bottleneck, which is Konvu's product area.
Randomization N/A Not an RCT.
Protocol Deviation N/A Not an RCT.
Conflict Of Interest Some concerns Konvu sells triage tools that sit downstream of SAST scanners.

← Back to item overview