R0057/2026-04-01/C022/H1

Research	R0057 — RLHF Yes-Men Claims v3
Run	2026-04-01
Claim	C022
Hypothesis	H1

Statement

No shared vocabulary bridges exist at all

Status

Current: Plausible

Supporting Evidence

Evidence	Summary
SRC01-E01	Vocabulary gap exists; some bridging attempts but no widely adopted shared vocabulary

Contradicting Evidence

Evidence	Summary
—	No contradicting evidence found

Reasoning

Georgetown CSET published an issue brief connecting AI safety and automation bias. A 2026 medRxiv paper introduces 'structural drift' as a bridging concept. However, neither has achieved widespread adoption as a shared vocabulary across AI safety and human factors communities.

Relationship to Other Hypotheses

H1 represents full accuracy. H2 allows for partial correctness. H3 is eliminated by the evidence.