Skip to content

R0057/2026-04-01/C005 — Assessment

BLUF

Confirmed. Wei et al. (2023) report reductions between 4.7% (Flan-PaLM-62B) and 10.0% (Flan-cont-PaLM-62B) across PaLM model variants.

Probability

Rating: Very likely (80-95%)

Confidence in assessment: High

Confidence rationale: Published at ICLR 2024 (top venue), from Google DeepMind researchers.

Reasoning Chain

  1. The paper evaluates PaLM models up to 540B parameters. Flan-cont-PaLM-62B showed 10.0% reduction; Flan-PaLM-62B showed 4.7% reduction; Flan-PaLM-8B showed 8.8% reduction. The intervention involved finetuning on prompts where truthfulness is independent of user opinion. [SRC01-E01, High reliability, High relevance]

  2. JUDGMENT: Confirmed. Wei et al. (2023) report reductions between 4.7% (Flan-PaLM-62B) and 10.0% (Flan-cont-PaLM-62B) across PaLM model variants.

Evidence Base Summary

Source Description Reliability Relevance Key Finding
SRC01 Wei et al. (2023) — Simple synthetic data reduces sycophancy High High Synthetic data reduces sycophancy by 4.7% to 10.0% across PaLM model variants

Collection Synthesis

Dimension Assessment
Evidence quality High
Source agreement High
Source independence Medium
Outliers None identified

Detail

The evidence supports the assessment. Published at ICLR 2024 (top venue), from Google DeepMind researchers.

Gaps

Missing Evidence Impact on Assessment
Additional independent verification Would strengthen confidence

Researcher Bias Check

Declared biases: Anti-sycophancy bias could influence interpretation toward confirming sycophancy claims.

Influence assessment: Mitigated by reliance on peer-reviewed and primary sources.

Cross-References

Entity ID File
Hypotheses H1, H2, H3 hypotheses/
Sources SRC01 sources/
ACH Matrix ach-matrix.md
Self-Audit self-audit.md