R0057/2026-04-01/C003/H1¶
Statement¶
The claim accurately captures the paper's attribution
Status¶
Current: Supported
Supporting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Sycophancy attributed to systematic bias in human annotator preferences, not algorithmic failures in RLHF |
Contradicting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| — | No contradicting evidence found |
Reasoning¶
The paper explicitly identifies mixed-pair bias — the average implied score difference in comparisons between agreement and correction responses — as the mechanism. The algorithm works correctly; it optimizes a biased objective.
Relationship to Other Hypotheses¶
H1 represents full accuracy. H2 allows for partial correctness. H3 is eliminated by the evidence.