Skip to content

R0056/2026-04-01/C008

Claim: DeepSeek V3, trained with RLVR, was found to be the most sycophantic model in an independent evaluation.

BLUF: Partially correct with important corrections. DeepSeek V3 was the SECOND most sycophantic (not the most — Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct was first). DeepSeek V3 was trained with GRPO, not RLVR. The evaluation was the Stanford/Science study.

Probability: Unlikely (20-45%) | Confidence: High


Summary

Entity Description
Claim Definition Claim text, scope, status
Assessment Full analytical product with reasoning chain
ACH Matrix Evidence x hypotheses diagnosticity analysis
Self-Audit ROBIS-adapted 5-domain audit

Hypotheses

ID Hypothesis Status
H1 Claim is accurate Inconclusive
H2 Partially correct — second most, wrong training method Supported
H3 Materially wrong Inconclusive

Searches

ID Target Results Selected
S01 Evidence for claim 10 2

Sources

Source Description Reliability Relevance
SRC01 Stanford/Science 2026 + SCMP High High

Revisit Triggers

  • New evidence or corrections to cited sources
  • Replication or refutation of key findings