E01¶


Research	R0055 — RLHF Yes-Men Claims
Run	2026-04-01
Claim	C014
Source	SRC01
Evidence	SRC01-E01
Type	Reported

Author reports searching 29 sources and finding zero sycophancy warnings; cannot independently verify

URL:

Extract¶

The claim describes the author's own search methodology. No independent verification was possible. The plausibility is supported by: (1) sycophancy as a term is primarily used in AI research, not corporate training; (2) corporate training typically lags research by years; (3) Georgetown Law's own analysis (2025-2026) frames sycophancy as a problem companies should address but have not.

Relevance to Hypotheses¶

Hypothesis	Relationship	Strength
H1	Supports	Moderate
H2	Supports	Strong
H3	Contradicts	Strong

Context¶

Evidence directly relevant to testing the claim's factual assertions.