R0052/2026-03-31/C008 — Claim Definition¶
Claim as Received¶
Platt deliberately numbered his final step "1'" (one-prime, not four) to signal that it's a loop, not a sequence.
Claim as Clarified¶
In Platt's 1964 'Strong Inference' paper, the final step of the method is numbered 1' (one-prime) rather than 4, which signals that the process is cyclical — after completing steps 1-3, you recycle back to a refined version of step 1.
BLUF¶
The claim is accurate. Platt numbered his final step 1' (one-prime), not 4. The step reads: '1') Recycling the procedure, making subhypotheses or sequential hypotheses to refine the possibilities that remain.' Multiple sources confirm this deliberate numbering to signal a loop.
Scope¶
- Domain: History of scientific methodology
- Timeframe: 1964
- Testability: Directly verifiable against Platt's original paper
Assessment Summary¶
Probability: Almost certain (95-99%)
Confidence: High
Hypothesis outcome: H1 supported — the 1' numbering is confirmed by multiple reproductions of Platt's text.
[Full assessment in assessment.md.]
Status¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Date created | 2026-03-31 |
| Date completed | 2026-03-31 |
| Researcher profile | Phil Moore |
| Prompt version | ai-research-methodology v1 research.md |
| Revisit by | 2027-03-31 |
| Revisit trigger | Textual analysis of original paper reveals different numbering |