R0051/2026-03-31/Q003/SRC03

Research	R0051 — Fact-Checking Gap
Run	2026-03-31
Query	Q003
Search	S03
Result	S03-R02
Source	SRC03

Kavtaradze (2024) — Challenges of automating fact-checking

Source

Field	Value
Title	Challenges of Automating Fact-Checking: A Technographic Case Study
Publisher	SAGE
Author(s)	Lasha Kavtaradze
Date	2024
URL	https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27523543241280195
Type	Research paper

Summary

Dimension	Rating
Reliability	Medium-High
Relevance	Medium
Bias: Missing data	Low risk
Bias: Measurement	Low risk
Bias: Selective reporting	Low risk
Bias: Randomization	N/A — not an RCT
Bias: Protocol deviation	N/A — not an RCT
Bias: COI/Funding	Low risk

Rationale

Dimension	Rationale
Reliability	Peer-reviewed case study in a reputable journal.
Relevance	Documents the gap between automated fact-checking capabilities and practitioner needs — indirect but relevant evidence of the methodological gap.
Bias flags	Single case study limits generalizability.

Evidence Extracts

Evidence ID	Summary
SRC03-E01	Gap between automated tools and fact-checker needs