R0051/2026-03-31/Q003 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: Gap documented + solution proposed | H2: Gap documented, no GRADE-like solution | H3: Gap not documented | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: Three unsolved epistemological challenges | - | ++ | -- |
| SRC02-E01: Methods fail scientific standards | - | ++ | -- |
| SRC03-E01: Tool-practitioner gap | - | + | -- |
| SRC04-E01: Confidence methodology confusion | - | ++ | -- |
| SRC05-E01: AI deepens gap | - | + | -- |
Legend:
- ++ Strongly supports
- + Supports
- -- Strongly contradicts
- - Contradicts
- N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC02-E01 | Most explicit gap documentation — and proposed "solution" is abandonment, not framework development. Discriminates between H1 (solution proposed = framework) and H2 (solution proposed = abandonment) |
| SRC04-E01 | Practitioner-level evidence of the gap — strongly eliminates H3 and discriminates between H1 and H2 (practitioners do not have solutions, just questions) |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC05-E01 | Documents gap deepening but does not strongly discriminate between H1 and H2 — could be read as urgency for solutions |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H2 — Gap documented, no GRADE-like solution proposed. Uniform support across all evidence.
Hypotheses eliminated: H1 — No evidence of framework solution proposals. H3 — Five independent papers explicitly document the gap.
Hypotheses inconclusive: None.