R0051/2026-03-31/Q002/SRC04
Srba et al. (2025) — Survey on automatic credibility assessment
Source
| Field |
Value |
| Title |
A Survey on Automatic Credibility Assessment of Textual Credibility Signals in the Era of Large Language Models |
| Publisher |
arXiv / academic survey |
| Author(s) |
Ivan Srba et al. |
| Date |
2025 |
| URL |
https://arxiv.org/html/2410.21360v2 |
| Type |
Research paper (survey) |
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
Medium |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
N/A |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Comprehensive survey with international authorship. Extensive literature review. |
| Relevance |
Provides independent assessment of CCIV status — confirms it is "informal and incomplete" but foundational. |
| Bias flags |
No apparent concerns. |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC04-E01 |
CCIV is informal, incomplete, not standardized but foundational for research |