R0051/2026-03-31/Q002/SRC01
W3C Credibility Signals specification — Editor's Draft (October 2018)
Source
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
Medium |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
High risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
N/A |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Some concerns |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
W3C Community Group specification — authoritative venue but explicitly marked as work-in-progress with "completely bogus content" warning. Never advanced beyond Editor's Draft. |
| Relevance |
Directly addresses the query — this IS the credibility signals specification being asked about. |
| Bias flags |
High risk for missing data — many sections contain "TBD" placeholders. The document is incomplete by design. Some concerns about selective reporting — the document catalogs "possible signals" without commitment to which should be used. |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC01-E01 |
Specification status, structure, and absence of formal evidence evaluation features |