R0051/2026-03-31/Q002/S03¶
WebSearch — Credibility Coalition research outputs and annotation studies
Summary¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source/Database | WebSearch |
| Query terms | credibility coalition content credibility indicators vocabulary annotation study reliability 2018 2019 |
| Filters | None |
| Results returned | 10 |
| Results selected | 3 |
| Results rejected | 7 |
Selected Results¶
| Result | Title | URL | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| S03-R01 | Survey on Automatic Credibility Assessment (Srba 2025) | https://arxiv.org/html/2410.21360v2 | Most recent survey citing CCIV — status assessment |
| S03-R02 | A Structured Response to Misinformation (Zhang 2018) | https://researchgate.net/publication/324639995_A_Structured_Response_to_Misinformation_Defining_and_Annotating_Credibility_Indicators_in_News_Articles | Foundational annotation study |
| S03-R03 | Credibility Coalition Research page | https://credibilitycoalition.org/research/ | Research outputs listing |
Rejected Results¶
| Result | Title | URL | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| S03-R04 | Survey v1 (duplicate) | https://arxiv.org/html/2410.21360v1 | Earlier version of S03-R01 |
| S03-R05 | Credibility Coalition main (duplicate) | https://credibilitycoalition.org/ | Already captured as S01-R03 |
| S03-R06 | InfluenceWatch — Credibility Coalition | https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/credibility-coalition/ | Organizational profile, not specification content |
| S03-R07 | Survey preprint (duplicate) | https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/223241/1/2410.21360v1.pdf | PDF duplicate of S03-R01 |
| S03-R08 | EDMO Content Reliability | https://edmo.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Enhancing-Content-Reliability-by-Prominence.-Indicators-for-Trustworthy-Online-Sources-Report.pdf | European initiative — different from W3C/Coalition work |
| S03-R09 | Hypothesis blog: Credibility annotation | https://web.hypothes.is/blog/evaluating-credibility-on-the-web-with-annotation/ | Blog post about annotation tool integration — supplementary |
| S03-R10 | CCIV specification (duplicate) | https://credweb.org/cciv | Already captured as S02-R03 |
Notes¶
The 2025 survey by Srba et al. provides the most current academic assessment of the CCIV's status — describing it as "an informal and incomplete draft" that "has not been standardized yet" but "served as a foundation to several research works."