R0051/2026-03-31/Q001/SRC01
Vandenberghe (2025) — Epistemological framework for fact-checking in journalism
Source
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
N/A |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Peer-reviewed publication in a leading journalism studies journal. Published in 2025, representing the most current academic work on this exact topic. |
| Relevance |
Directly addresses the query — develops an epistemological framework for fact-checking, analyzing three core challenges. This is the most directly relevant source found. |
| Bias flags |
As an academic analytical paper rather than empirical study, measurement and RCT domains are not applicable. No apparent conflicts of interest. |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC01-E01 |
Three deep-rooted epistemological challenges in fact-checking |
| SRC01-E02 |
Triangulation and source criticism as existing verification methods |