Skip to content

R0050/2026-03-31/Q003 — ACH Matrix

Matrix

H1: Procedurally integrated H2: Purely conceptual H3: Partial/indirect
SRC01-E01: Original report frames as conceptual framework -- ++ +
SRC02-E01: Analysis confirms primarily conceptual -- ++ +
SRC03-E01: Categories adopted as vocabulary but not as procedure -- + ++

Legend: ++ Strongly supports · + Supports · -- Strongly contradicts · - Contradicts · N/A Not applicable

Diagnosticity Analysis

Most Diagnostic Evidence

Evidence Why Diagnostic
SRC03-E01 Content moderation evidence discriminates between H2 (purely conceptual) and H3 (indirect influence) — the taxonomy clearly influences vocabulary and thinking even without procedural integration

Least Diagnostic Evidence

Evidence Why Non-Diagnostic
SRC02-E01 Confirms conceptual status without clearly discriminating between H2 and H3

Outcome

Hypothesis supported: H3 — The taxonomy has achieved widespread vocabulary adoption and conceptual influence without procedural integration into formal methodologies.

Hypotheses eliminated: H1 — No evidence of procedural integration in any published methodology.

Hypotheses inconclusive: H2 — Partially supported but "purely conceptual" understates the taxonomy's real-world influence as vocabulary and framing.