R0050/2026-03-31/Q003 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: Procedurally integrated | H2: Purely conceptual | H3: Partial/indirect | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: Original report frames as conceptual framework | -- | ++ | + |
| SRC02-E01: Analysis confirms primarily conceptual | -- | ++ | + |
| SRC03-E01: Categories adopted as vocabulary but not as procedure | -- | + | ++ |
Legend: ++ Strongly supports · + Supports · -- Strongly contradicts · - Contradicts · N/A Not applicable
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC03-E01 | Content moderation evidence discriminates between H2 (purely conceptual) and H3 (indirect influence) — the taxonomy clearly influences vocabulary and thinking even without procedural integration |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC02-E01 | Confirms conceptual status without clearly discriminating between H2 and H3 |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H3 — The taxonomy has achieved widespread vocabulary adoption and conceptual influence without procedural integration into formal methodologies.
Hypotheses eliminated: H1 — No evidence of procedural integration in any published methodology.
Hypotheses inconclusive: H2 — Partially supported but "purely conceptual" understates the taxonomy's real-world influence as vocabulary and framing.