Skip to content

R0050/2026-03-31-02/Q003 — ACH Matrix

Matrix

H1: Fully operationalized H2: Adopted as vocabulary, not procedures H3: No meaningful adoption
SRC01-E01: Original report is explicitly conceptual -- ++ N/A
SRC02-E01: First Draft trains with framework as lens - ++ --
SRC03-E01: EU adopts terminology in policy - ++ --
SRC04-E01: Handbook presents descriptive categories only -- ++ -
SRC05-E01: No implementation evidence found -- + +

Legend:

  • ++ Strongly supports
  • + Supports
  • -- Strongly contradicts
  • - Contradicts
  • N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis

Diagnosticity Analysis

Most Diagnostic Evidence

Evidence Why Diagnostic
SRC04-E01 Verification Handbook is the most likely venue for operationalization — its absence there strongly discriminates H1 from H2
SRC02-E01 First Draft is the creators' own organization — if operationalization existed anywhere, it would be here

Least Diagnostic Evidence

Evidence Why Non-Diagnostic
SRC05-E01 Secondary review — absence of implementation details could be an artifact of the review's scope

Outcome

Hypothesis supported: H2 — The taxonomy has been widely adopted as vocabulary and conceptual lens but not operationalized into structured classification procedures.

Hypotheses eliminated: H1 — No structured classification tools found. H3 — Significant real-world adoption demonstrated (EU policy, 37+ newsrooms, UNESCO).

Hypotheses inconclusive: None.