R0050/2026-03-31-02/Q003 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: Fully operationalized | H2: Adopted as vocabulary, not procedures | H3: No meaningful adoption | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: Original report is explicitly conceptual | -- | ++ | N/A |
| SRC02-E01: First Draft trains with framework as lens | - | ++ | -- |
| SRC03-E01: EU adopts terminology in policy | - | ++ | -- |
| SRC04-E01: Handbook presents descriptive categories only | -- | ++ | - |
| SRC05-E01: No implementation evidence found | -- | + | + |
Legend:
++Strongly supports+Supports--Strongly contradicts-ContradictsN/ANot applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC04-E01 | Verification Handbook is the most likely venue for operationalization — its absence there strongly discriminates H1 from H2 |
| SRC02-E01 | First Draft is the creators' own organization — if operationalization existed anywhere, it would be here |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC05-E01 | Secondary review — absence of implementation details could be an artifact of the review's scope |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H2 — The taxonomy has been widely adopted as vocabulary and conceptual lens but not operationalized into structured classification procedures.
Hypotheses eliminated: H1 — No structured classification tools found. H3 — Significant real-world adoption demonstrated (EU policy, 37+ newsrooms, UNESCO).
Hypotheses inconclusive: None.