R0050/2026-03-31-02/Q002/SRC01
Legal standards of proof — calibrated hierarchy with empirical probability estimates
Source
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
Some concerns |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Peer-reviewed academic study from Duke University, 124 judges surveyed |
| Relevance |
Directly quantifies legal standards of proof as probability ranges — enables comparison with ICD 203 |
| Bias flags |
Measurement concern: judges' probability estimates are subjective self-reports, not observed behavior |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC01-E01 |
Legal standards form a six-tier hierarchy calibrated to consequence severity with empirical probability estimates |