R0050/2026-03-31-02/Q002/H3¶
Statement¶
The named disciplines either lack formal evidence evaluation methodologies or contribute concepts already fully captured by the nine reference frameworks — no novel contributions exist.
Status¶
Current: Eliminated
Supporting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| None | No evidence supports the claim that these disciplines lack formal methodologies |
Contradicting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Legal standards are clearly formal and contribute novel consequence-calibration |
| SRC02-E01 | Auditing standards are clearly formal with novel dual-axis evaluation |
| SRC04-E01 | FMEA is clearly formal with novel RPN methodology |
Reasoning¶
Every discipline examined has formal, published methodology documents. Multiple disciplines contribute clearly novel concepts. H3 is eliminated on both counts.
Relationship to Other Hypotheses¶
H3 is the null hypothesis. Its elimination confirms that both H1 and H2 are more accurate, with the evidence favoring H1.