R0050/2026-03-31-02/Q001/SRC08
Academic analysis of fact-checking epistemology (2025)
Source
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
Medium-High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
N/A |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Peer-reviewed academic publication in a respected journalism studies journal |
| Relevance |
Directly analyzes epistemological foundations and gaps in fact-checking methodology |
| Bias flags |
No significant concerns; academic analysis without apparent advocacy position |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC08-E01 |
Academic research identifies three epistemological challenges in fact-checking methodology |