R0049/2026-03-31/Q002-SRC02 — Scorecard¶
Source¶
| Title | Confidence levels and likelihood terms in IPCC reports: a survey of experts from different scientific disciplines |
| Publisher | Climatic Change (Springer) |
| Authors | Multiple |
| Date | 2022 |
| URL | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-022-03382-3 |
| Type | Peer-reviewed journal article |
Ratings¶
| Dimension | Rating |
|---|---|
| Reliability | High |
| Relevance | Medium |
| Missing data | Low risk |
| Measurement | Low risk |
| Selective reporting | Low risk |
| Randomization | Low risk |
| Protocol deviation | Low risk |
| COI/funding | Low risk |
Rationale¶
| Dimension | Rationale |
|---|---|
| Reliability | Peer-reviewed survey in established climate science journal |
| Relevance | Studies cross-discipline interpretation of calibrated language — parallel to IC challenges but does not reference IC standards |
Evidence Extracts¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC02-E01 | Physical scientists more familiar with IPCC guidance than other experts; cross-discipline interpretation challenges mirror IC challenges |