Skip to content

R0049/2026-03-31/Q001
Research R0049 — Landscape Scan
Run 2026-03-31
Query Q001

Query

Has anyone published a complete, usable AI/LLM system prompt that implements a full analytical rigor framework for research?

BLUF

No published system prompt implements a complete analytical rigor framework for AI research. Partial implementations exist — individual structured analytic techniques as LLM tools and framework-guided screening prompts — but none achieve comprehensive coverage combining evidence scoring, bias assessment, confidence calibration, competing hypotheses, and self-audit.

Answer + Confidence

Very unlikely (05-20%) that a complete published framework prompt exists undiscovered. Confidence: Medium-High.

Summary

Document Link
Query Definition query.md
Full Assessment assessment.md
ACH Matrix ach-matrix.md
Self-Audit self-audit.md

Hypotheses

ID Statement Status
H1 A full framework prompt exists Partially supported
H2 Nothing exists at all Eliminated
H3 Partial implementations only Supported

Searches

Search Type Outcome
S01 Academic literature 3 selected / 17 rejected — reporting checklists and methodology extensions, no complete prompts
S02 GitHub repositories 3 selected / 17 rejected — prompt libraries lack methodology content; research tools lack rigor
S03 Practitioner publications 2 selected / 18 rejected — individual SAT implementations and framework-guided prompting

Sources

Source Reliability Relevance Evidence
SRC01 PRISMA-trAIce High Medium SRC01-E01
SRC02 Framework CoT Medium-High High SRC02-E01
SRC03 LLM Prompt Library Medium Medium SRC03-E01
SRC04 LLM SATs FTW Medium High SRC04-E01
SRC05 Agent Laboratory Medium-High Medium SRC05-E01

Revisit Triggers

  • Publication of a comprehensive research methodology system prompt on GitHub or in academic literature
  • Release of AI research agent tools that explicitly implement ICD 203, GRADE, or ROBIS frameworks
  • Framework Chain-of-Thought paper publication in peer-reviewed venue (currently preprint)
  • Roberts or similar practitioners extending individual SAT tools into unified frameworks