S01 — Academic Prompt Frameworks Search Log
| Field |
Value |
| Tool |
WebSearch |
| Query |
AI LLM system prompt implementing full research methodology framework GRADE PRISMA systematic review 2024 2025 |
| Date |
2026-03-31 |
| Results returned |
10 |
| Selected |
3 |
| Rejected |
7 |
Summary
Searched for academic publications describing complete system prompts implementing research methodology frameworks. Results heavily skewed toward papers about using LLMs within PRISMA workflows (screening, extraction) rather than prompts implementing PRISMA as an analytical framework.
Selected Results
| Result |
Title |
Rationale |
| S01-R01 |
PRISMA-trAIce Checklist |
Directly addresses AI in systematic review methodology — reporting standard |
| S01-R02 |
PRISMA-DFLLM Extension |
Domain-specific LLM framework combining PRISMA with LLMs |
| S01-R03 |
Emergence of LLMs as Tools in Literature Reviews |
Systematic review of LLM use in review processes |
Rejected Results
| Result |
Title |
Rationale for Rejection |
| — |
AI Agents in Clinical Medicine (PMC) |
About AI agents as subjects, not implementing methodology in prompts |
| — |
LLM-Powered Automated Assessment (MDPI) |
Focused on educational assessment, not research methodology |
| — |
LLMs and PRISMA 2020 Adherence (Springer) |
Uses LLMs to check adherence, not implement framework |
| — |
Evaluation of AI Tools vs PRISMA (PMC) |
Compares AI tools against PRISMA, not implementing it |
| — |
Systematic Review of Multilingual Applications (ERIC) |
Unrelated to analytical rigor frameworks |
| — |
Emergence of LLMs (duplicate PMC) |
Duplicate of selected result |
| — |
LLMs as Tools in Literature Reviews (Oxford) |
Duplicate of selected result |
Notes
The academic literature treats PRISMA and GRADE as standards to evaluate AI against, not as frameworks to implement within AI system prompts. This is a significant finding for the query.