R0048/2026-04-01/Q003/H3¶
Statement¶
Training materials do not meaningfully address hallucination at all, or address it only as a minor/occasional error rather than a significant concern.
Status¶
Current: Eliminated
Supporting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| (minimal) | Some commercial training (NAVEX) may underweight hallucination coverage, but this is speculative |
Contradicting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC03-E01 | DOL explicitly names hallucination as a core training topic |
| SRC01-E01 | IAPP frames hallucination as a systemic governance concern |
| SRC05-E01 | Research community treats hallucination as fundamental, not occasional |
Reasoning¶
The DOL framework's explicit naming of "hallucinations and accuracy limits" eliminates H3. Hallucination is the one AI failure mode that has successfully entered the training vocabulary. It is the most widely addressed specific AI limitation across all the training materials examined.
Relationship to Other Hypotheses¶
H3 is eliminated. Hallucination is addressed in training — the question is how it is characterized (H1 comprehensive vs H2 random-error framing), not whether it is addressed at all.