Q002-S02 — Automation Bias and Overreliance — Search Log
Summary
| Field |
Value |
| Source/Database |
Web search (targeted: automation bias, overreliance, NIST, standards) |
| Query terms |
Multiple: "automation bias overtrust AI training corporate"; "NIST AI risk management framework confabulation sycophancy"; "Microsoft overreliance AI literature review" |
| Filters |
None |
| Results returned |
30 (across 3 searches) |
| Results selected |
4 |
| Results rejected |
26 |
Selected Results
| Result |
Title |
URL |
Rationale |
| S02-R01 |
Overreliance on AI: Literature Review |
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Aether-Overreliance-on-AI-Review-Final-6.21.22.pdf |
Comprehensive review of ~60 papers on overreliance |
| S02-R02 |
NIST AI 600-1 |
https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ai/NIST.AI.600-1.pdf |
Authoritative risk framework; confabulation but not sycophancy |
| S02-R03 |
Overreliance on AI: Addressing Automation Bias Today |
https://www.lumenova.ai/blog/overreliance-on-ai-adressing-automation-bias-today/ |
40% zero-scrutiny finding |
| S02-R04 |
The Yes-Machine Problem |
https://www.webpronews.com/the-yes-machine-problem-how-sycophantic-ai-is-becoming-a-safety-crisis-nobody-wants-to-talk-about/ |
Comprehensive synthesis including regulatory gaps |
Rejected Results
| Result |
Title |
URL |
Rationale |
| (26 results) |
Various |
Various |
Not directly about sycophancy warnings in training materials |
Notes
The human-factors search (automation bias, overtrust, overreliance) returned more corporate-relevant results than the AI safety search (sycophancy). However, even the automation bias literature focuses on the phenomenon rather than on training programs that address it.