Skip to content

R0044/2026-04-01/Q003/S01

WebSearch — Bridging automation bias and sycophancy vocabularies

Summary

Field Value
Source/Database WebSearch
Query terms '"automation bias" "sycophancy" bridge connecting vocabulary human factors AI safety research paper'
Filters None
Results returned 10
Results selected 2
Results rejected 8

Selected Results

Result Title URL Rationale
S01-R01 CSET AI Safety and Automation Bias https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/ai-safety-and-automation-bias/ Title bridges AI safety + automation bias; cross-referenced from Q001
S01-R02 Sycophancy in LLMs: Causes and Mitigations https://arxiv.org/html/2411.15287v1 Counterexample: treats sycophancy as purely technical with no human factors bridge

Rejected Results

Result Title URL Rationale
S01-R03 Various automation bias and sycophancy articles (8 results) Various Included: Springer human-AI collaboration review, ISQ national security study, Wikipedia, EIMT explainer, PMC overtrust study, Rainbird blog, Medium post, AI hype article. All address one tradition or the other but none explicitly bridge both vocabularies.

Notes

The direct search for vocabulary bridging was mostly unsuccessful — no single paper explicitly declares the purpose of bridging human factors and AI safety vocabularies. The CSET brief comes closest with its title framing. The sycophancy technical survey (Malmqvist) was included as a counterexample demonstrating the silo pattern.