R0043/2026-04-01/Q003/H2¶
Statement¶
The vocabulary gap has not been identified as a problem — each domain's terminology is considered sufficient, and no one is working to bridge them.
Status¶
Current: Eliminated
Supporting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| None | No source argues that the current terminology fragmentation is adequate or desirable |
Contradicting Evidence¶
| Evidence | Summary |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Trilateral Research explicitly calls this a problem requiring solutions |
| SRC02-E01 | CSIRO/UNSW identifies "divergent practices and terminologies" as obstructing effective communication |
Reasoning¶
Every source that addresses the terminology question identifies it as a problem. No source defends the status quo. H2 is eliminated by the evidence.
Relationship to Other Hypotheses¶
H2 is eliminated. H1 and H3 both supported by evidence.