Skip to content

R0043/2026-04-01/Q002/SRC05/E01

Research R0043 — Sycophancy Vocabulary
Run 2026-04-01
Query Q002
Source SRC05
Evidence SRC05-E01
Type Factual

IEEE 3119 AI procurement standard — six core processes without sycophancy provisions

URL: https://standards.ieee.org/beyond-standards/ai-procurement-guidelines-regulatory-compliance/

Extract

IEEE 3119 structures AI procurement around six core processes:

  1. Problem Definition
  2. Solicitation Preparation
  3. Vendor Evaluation
  4. Solution Evaluation
  5. Contract Negotiation
  6. Contract Monitoring

The standard helps procurement teams incorporate "AI-specific requirements such as data transparency, governance maturity, and adaptability to evolving regulations."

JUDGMENT: IEEE 3119 provides a structured framework for AI procurement but does not include sycophancy, agreeableness, or agreement-seeking behavior as evaluation criteria. The "Solution Evaluation" phase could theoretically include sycophancy testing, but the standard does not specify this. This is consistent with the finding that enterprise software evaluation lacks domain-native vocabulary for this phenomenon.

Relevance to Hypotheses

Hypothesis Relationship Strength
H1 Partially contradicts Procurement standard exists but without sycophancy provisions
H2 Supports No sycophancy-specific requirements
H3 Supports General framework without specific sycophancy coverage

Context

The absence of sycophancy from IEEE's procurement standard is notable because IEEE Spectrum (the organization's publication) has published articles on sycophancy. The standards arm has not yet incorporated what the editorial arm reports on.