R0043/2026-04-01/Q001/SRC03

Research	R0043 — Sycophancy Vocabulary
Run	2026-04-01
Query	Q001
Search	S02
Result	S02-R01
Source	SRC03

Georgetown CSET issue brief on AI safety and automation bias in defense contexts

Source

Field	Value
Title	AI Safety and Automation Bias
Publisher	Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET), Georgetown University
Author(s)	CSET staff
Date	November 2024
URL	https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/CSET-AI-Safety-and-Automation-Bias.pdf
Type	Policy research / Issue brief

Summary

Dimension	Rating
Reliability	High
Relevance	High
Bias: Missing data	Low risk
Bias: Measurement	Low risk
Bias: Selective reporting	Low risk
Bias: Randomization	N/A -- not an RCT
Bias: Protocol deviation	N/A -- not an RCT
Bias: COI/Funding	Low risk

Rationale

Dimension	Rationale
Reliability	Georgetown CSET is a respected policy research institution with national security focus
Relevance	Directly bridges AI safety and defense/military terminology for automation bias
Bias flags	Government-funded research center; independent analysis

Evidence Extracts

Evidence ID	Summary
SRC03-E01	Defense/military terminology: automation bias, automation complacency, overtrust, and their relationship to AI safety concepts