R0043/2026-03-28/Q003/SRC04
We Can't Understand AI Using Existing Vocabulary
Source
| Field |
Value |
| Title |
We Can't Understand AI Using Existing Vocabulary |
| Publisher |
Various |
| Author(s) |
Various |
| Date |
2024-2025 |
| URL |
https://arxiv.org/html/2502.07586v1 |
| Type |
Research paper/repository |
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
Medium-High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Some concerns |
| Bias: Measurement |
Low risk |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Academic research; well-cited |
| Relevance |
Addresses AI vocabulary/taxonomy bridging |
| Bias flags |
Some missing data concern: may not capture all sycophancy-adjacent terminology |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC04-E01 |
Argues vocabulary gap is deeper than taxonomy: machine concepts do not map to human concepts, requiring neologisms |