R0043/2026-03-28/Q002 — Self-Audit¶
ROBIS 4-Domain Audit¶
Domain 1: Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Evidence criteria defined before searching | Yes — formal requirements, procurement specs, regulatory guidance |
| Criteria consistent throughout research | Yes |
| Criteria appropriate for the question | Yes |
Notes: Criteria were clear: formal, documented requirements from regulated industries.
Domain 2: Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Some concerns
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Multiple search strategies used | Yes — 3 searches across procurement, regulatory, and international standards |
| Searches designed to test each hypothesis | Yes |
| All results dispositioned | Yes — 50 results returned, all dispositioned |
| Source diversity achieved | Partial — EU, U.S., and cross-jurisdictional; limited non-English sources |
Notes: Proprietary procurement documents are not publicly searchable, limiting the evidence base. Defense-classified or FOUO documents may contain more specific requirements.
Domain 3: Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All sources scored using same framework | Yes |
| Evidence typed consistently | Yes |
| ACH matrix applied | Yes |
| Diagnosticity analysis performed | Yes |
Notes: Consistent application across all 6 sources.
Domain 4: Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All hypotheses given fair hearing | Yes — H1 received supporting evidence from EU AI Act and FDA before being qualified |
| Contradictory evidence surfaced | Yes — searched for direct requirements; absence documented |
| Confidence calibrated to evidence | Yes |
| Gaps acknowledged | Yes — proprietary and classified documents noted |
Notes: The null finding for ISO/IEC 42001 and financial services is itself evidence, not a gap.
Overall Assessment¶
Overall risk of bias: Low risk
The main limitation is access to proprietary procurement documents. Public-facing evidence is consistently indirect.
Researcher Bias Check¶
- Confirmation bias risk: The query builds on Q001's vocabulary gap finding, which could predispose toward finding a requirements gap. Mitigated by active search for direct requirements (H1).