R0043/2026-03-28/Q001/SRC10
We Can't Understand AI Using our Existing Vocabulary — arXiv 2025
Source
| Field |
Value |
| Title |
We Can't Understand AI Using our Existing Vocabulary |
| Publisher |
arXiv |
| Author(s) |
Various |
| Date |
February 2025 |
| URL |
https://arxiv.org/html/2502.07586v1 |
| Type |
Research paper (preprint) |
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
Medium |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Some concerns |
| Bias: Measurement |
Low risk |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Some concerns |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A — not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Preprint, not yet peer-reviewed; but arguments are well-structured and novel |
| Relevance |
Directly addresses the fundamental vocabulary gap between human and machine concepts — the meta-question underlying Q001 |
| Bias flags |
Some concern about selective reporting: advocates strongly for neologisms, may undervalue existing cross-domain vocabulary |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC10-E01 |
Argument that existing vocabulary is fundamentally insufficient; proposal for neologisms as bridging concepts |