Skip to content

R0043/2026-03-28/Q001/SRC01

Research R0043 — Sycophancy Vocabulary
Run 2026-03-28
Query Q001
Search S02
Result S02-R02
Source SRC01

Parasuraman & Manzey (2010) — Foundational integrated model of complacency and automation bias

Source

Field Value
Title Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration
Publisher Human Factors
Author(s) Raja Parasuraman, Dietrich H. Manzey
Date 2010
URL https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018720810376055
Type Research paper (peer-reviewed journal article)

Summary

Dimension Rating
Reliability High
Relevance High
Bias: Missing data Low risk
Bias: Measurement Low risk
Bias: Selective reporting Low risk
Bias: Randomization N/A — not an RCT
Bias: Protocol deviation N/A — not an RCT
Bias: COI/Funding Low risk

Rationale

Dimension Rationale
Reliability Foundational paper in human factors literature with 1000+ citations; authors are leading researchers in the field; published in the top human factors journal
Relevance Directly defines and distinguishes the two most important cross-domain terms: automation bias and automation complacency, which are the primary regulated-industry equivalents of AI sycophancy
Bias flags No significant bias concerns; comprehensive literature review methodology

Evidence Extracts

Evidence ID Summary
SRC01-E01 Integrated model distinguishing automation bias (active decision bias toward automation output) from automation complacency (passive monitoring failure)