Q001 — ACH Matrix¶


Research	R0042 — Private AI Motivations
Run	2026-04-01
Query	Q001

Matrix¶

	H1: Ranked consensus exists	H2: Overlapping non-identical lists	H3: No substantial evidence
SRC01-E01: Deloitte sovereign AI statistics	-	++	--
SRC02-E01: Allganize on-prem motivations	-	++	--
SRC03-E01: KPMG security constraints	N/A	+	--
SRC04-E01: Deepset sovereign AI motivations	-	++	--
SRC05-E01: Menlo Ventures build-vs-buy	N/A	+	--

Legend: - ++ Strongly supports - + Supports - -- Strongly contradicts - - Contradicts - N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis

Diagnosticity Analysis¶

Most Diagnostic Evidence¶

Evidence	Why Diagnostic
SRC01-E01	Deloitte documents sovereign AI motivations in detail but uses a completely different taxonomy than Allganize or KPMG — proving that no single ranked consensus exists (eliminates H1) while confirming substantial documentation (eliminates H3)
SRC04-E01	Adds behavioral governance and model drift prevention as motivations not mentioned in any consultancy survey — demonstrates the motivation space extends beyond what major surveys capture

Least Diagnostic Evidence¶

Evidence	Why Non-Diagnostic
SRC03-E01	KPMG tracks challenges and investment but does not directly address deployment-location motivations, making it supportive but not discriminating between H1 and H2

Outcome¶

Hypothesis supported: H2 — Multiple surveys document overlapping but non-identical motivation sets. The convergence on security/compliance/sovereignty with divergence on secondary priorities is the clearest pattern.

Hypotheses eliminated: H1 — No single ranked consensus list exists. H3 — Substantial evidence exists from multiple sources.

Hypotheses inconclusive: None