R0041/2026-04-01/Q002/SRC01
Kwik (2025) "Digital Yes-Men: How to Deal With Sycophantic Military AI?"
Source
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
Low risk |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A -- not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A -- not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Peer-reviewed paper in established policy journal; author affiliated with T.M.C. Asser Institute (The Hague) |
| Relevance |
The single most directly relevant source for the intersection of military AI and sycophancy |
| Bias flags |
No apparent commercial conflicts. Academic paper with transparent methodology |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC01-E01 |
Sycophancy in military AI aggravates cognitive biases and induces organizational overtrust; mitigations require both technical and user training approaches |