R0040/2026-04-01/Q002/SRC05
Cheng et al. -- Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions (Science, 2026)
Source
| Field |
Value |
| Title |
Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence |
| Publisher |
Science |
| Author(s) |
Myra Cheng, Dan Jurafsky et al. |
| Date |
2026-03-28 |
| URL |
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aec8352 |
| Type |
Research paper (peer-reviewed) |
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
Low risk |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
Low risk |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
Low risk |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Low risk |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Published in Science, one of the world's top scientific journals. Rigorous methodology testing 11 SOTA models. |
| Relevance |
Directly demonstrates real-world harms of sycophancy across all major AI models. |
| Bias flags |
No significant concerns. Academic research from Stanford without commercial ties to AI companies. |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC05-E01 |
AI affirms users 49% more than humans; reduces prosocial behavior; creates perverse incentives |