R0040/2026-04-01/Q001/SRC06
Anthropic -- Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback
Source
| Field |
Value |
| Title |
Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback |
| Publisher |
Anthropic |
| Author(s) |
Yuntao Bai et al. |
| Date |
2022-12-15 |
| URL |
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073 |
| Type |
Research paper |
Summary
| Dimension |
Rating |
| Reliability |
High |
| Relevance |
High |
| Bias: Missing data |
Low risk |
| Bias: Measurement |
Some concerns |
| Bias: Selective reporting |
Low risk |
| Bias: Randomization |
N/A -- not an RCT |
| Bias: Protocol deviation |
N/A -- not an RCT |
| Bias: COI/Funding |
Some concerns |
Rationale
| Dimension |
Rationale |
| Reliability |
Foundational paper from Anthropic. Well-cited. Introduced a method now used in production (Claude). |
| Relevance |
Directly introduces RLAIF/CAI as an RLHF alternative. |
| Bias flags |
Anthropic has commercial interest in CAI's success. However, the method is well-documented and the paper is transparent about limitations. Measurement concern: harmlessness evaluations rely on AI judges. |
| Evidence ID |
Summary |
| SRC06-E01 |
CAI replaces human feedback with AI-generated feedback under a constitution |