R0031/2026-03-27/C013 — Assessment

Research	R0031 — Plural Voice Claims Blind
Run	2026-03-27
Claim	C013

BLUF

Confirmed. He, Houde, and Weisz presented 'Which Contributions Deserve Credit?' at CHI 2025. N=155 knowledge workers. Finding: 'across nearly all natures of contribution, participants assigned AI partners less authorship credit than human partners for equivalent contributions.' Specific examples: for equal writing, AI scored -0.67 (secondary authorship) vs human -0.16 (equal authorship).

Probability

Rating: Almost certain (95-99%)

Confidence in assessment: High

Confidence rationale: Based on direct verification against primary sources.

Reasoning Chain

1. Primary sources identified and verified. [SRC01-E01, High, High]

Evidence Base Summary

Source	Description	Reliability	Relevance	Key Finding
SRC01	Primary source	High	High	See BLUF

Collection Synthesis

Dimension	Assessment
Evidence quality	Robust
Source agreement	High
Source independence	Appropriate
Outliers	None

Detail

Confirmed. He, Houde, and Weisz presented 'Which Contributions Deserve Credit?' at CHI 2025. N=155 knowledge workers. Finding: 'across nearly all natures of contribution, participants assigned AI partners less authorship credit than human partners for equivalent contributions.' Specific examples: for equal writing, AI scored -0.67 (secondary authorship) vs human -0.16 (equal authorship).

Gaps

Missing Evidence	Impact on Assessment
Some full-text sources inaccessible	Low

Researcher Bias Check

Declared biases: No researcher profile provided.

Influence assessment: N/A

Cross-References

Entity	ID	File
Hypotheses	H1, H2, H3	hypotheses/
Sources	SRC01+	sources/
ACH Matrix	—	ach-matrix.md
Self-Audit	—	self-audit.md