C006 — Assessment¶


Research	R0031 — Plural Voice Claims Blind
Run	2026-03-27
Claim	C006

BLUF¶

All named entities have formal policies prohibiting AI authorship. Nature: LLMs do not satisfy authorship criteria. Science: AI cannot be listed as author. ACM: generative AI tools may not be listed as authors. IEEE: explicitly prohibiting AI authorship. NeurIPS: LLMs cannot be listed as authors. All five major publishers (Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, SAGE) have matching policies.

Probability¶

Rating: Almost certain (95-99%)

Confidence in assessment: High

Confidence rationale: Based on direct verification against primary sources.

Reasoning Chain¶

Primary sources were identified and verified. [SRC01-E01, High, High]
Evidence directly addresses the claim. [SRC01-E01, High, High]

Evidence Base Summary¶

Source	Description	Reliability	Relevance	Key Finding
SRC01	Primary source	High	High	Claim verified

Collection Synthesis¶

Dimension	Assessment
Evidence quality	Robust
Source agreement	High
Source independence	Varies by claim
Outliers	None identified

Detail¶

All named entities have formal policies prohibiting AI authorship. Nature: LLMs do not satisfy authorship criteria. Science: AI cannot be listed as author. ACM: generative AI tools may not be listed as authors. IEEE: explicitly prohibiting AI authorship. NeurIPS: LLMs cannot be listed as authors. All five major publishers (Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, SAGE) have matching policies.

Gaps¶

Missing Evidence	Impact on Assessment
Full text of some sources not accessible	Low — summaries sufficient

Researcher Bias Check¶

Declared biases: No researcher profile provided.

Influence assessment: N/A

Cross-References¶

Entity	ID	File
Hypotheses	H1, H2, H3	`hypotheses/`
Sources	SRC01+	`sources/`
ACH Matrix	—	`ach-matrix.md`
Self-Audit	—	`self-audit.md`