R0029/2026-03-27/Q005/S01
WebSearch — Academic AI cheating surveys and statistics
Summary
| Field |
Value |
| Source/Database |
WebSearch (two queries) |
| Query terms |
"students using ChatGPT academic cheating study survey statistics 2024 2025" and "submitting AI-generated work as own plagiarism software engineering academic" |
| Filters |
None |
| Results returned |
20 |
| Results selected |
3 |
| Results rejected |
17 |
Selected Results
| Result |
Title |
URL |
Rationale |
| S01-R01 |
ChatGPT Cheating Statistics — NerdyNav |
https://nerdynav.com/chatgpt-cheating-statistics/ |
Comprehensive statistics compilation with cited sources |
| S01-R02 |
UK university vulnerability to GenAI cheating |
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2025.2511794 |
Formal case data from UK institutions |
| S01-R03 |
Stanford — high school cheating unchanged |
https://www.the74million.org/article/high-school-cheating-increase-from-chatgpt-research-finds-not-so-much/ |
Counterpoint: cheating rates stable pre/post-ChatGPT |
Rejected Results
| Result |
Title |
URL |
Rationale |
| S01-R04 |
Various guides, opinion pieces, and detection tool marketing |
Various |
Not primary data sources; commercial bias |
Notes
Academic cheating data is abundant. Software engineering misrepresentation data was not found despite targeted search.