R0029/2026-03-27/Q004 — Self-Audit¶
ROBIS 4-Domain Audit¶
Domain 1: Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Defined what counts as "based on or inspired by" | Yes — acknowledged the spectrum from close adaptation to thematic inspiration |
| Applied consistently | Yes |
Notes: Straightforward factual query with clear eligibility.
Domain 2: Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Multiple search strategies | Yes — broad Kurosawa-Shakespeare search plus targeted Bad Sleep Well search |
| All results dispositioned | Yes — 20 results, 3 selected, 17 rejected |
| Source diversity | Yes — institutional (BFI), scholarly (Criterion), popular (multiple) |
Notes: 2 searches, 20 results, 3 selected.
Domain 3: Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All sources scored | Yes |
| ACH matrix applied | Yes |
| Diagnosticity analysis | Yes |
Notes: Consistent application.
Domain 4: Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All hypotheses tested | Yes — H2 (excluding Bad Sleep Well) given fair hearing |
| Contradictory evidence surfaced | Yes — contested status of Bad Sleep Well noted |
| Confidence calibrated | Yes — High confidence supported by unanimous consensus |
| Gaps acknowledged | Yes — Japanese-language scholarship gap noted |
Notes: The contested Bad Sleep Well status was documented rather than glossed over.
Overall Assessment¶
Overall risk of bias: Low risk
Straightforward factual query with strong source consensus and low bias risk.
Researcher Bias Check¶
- Confirmation bias (low risk): No predisposition toward any particular answer expected for a filmography query.
- Western-centric bias (some concerns): All sources are English-language. Japanese critical perspectives may differ on the Bad Sleep Well classification.