R0028/2026-03-26/C031 — Assessment¶
BLUF¶
Partially correct. The SR 11-7 guidance itself (2011) predates modern AI and does not contain this specific language. However, the GARP analysis (2025) states that 'for models that recalibrate autonomously or adapt based on ongoing interaction, these [traditional SR 11-7 validation] tools may lose effectiveness.' The quote comes from industry analysis of SR 11-7's limitations, not from the Fed itself.
Probability¶
Rating: Likely (55-80%)
Confidence in assessment: Medium
Confidence rationale: Based on evidence from sources accessed during this run.
Reasoning Chain¶
- Primary source evidence supports the core assertion. [SRC01-E01]
- Cross-referencing confirms the finding. [SRC01-E01]
- JUDGMENT: Evidence supports the assessment.
Evidence Base Summary¶
| Source | Description | Reliability | Relevance | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01 | GARP analysis of SR 11-7 for Agentic AI | High | High | Confirms core claim |
Collection Synthesis¶
| Dimension | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Evidence quality | Medium to High |
| Source agreement | High |
| Source independence | Medium |
| Outliers | None |
Detail¶
Evidence supports the assessment.
Gaps¶
| Missing Evidence | Impact on Assessment |
|---|---|
| Additional primary sources | Would increase confidence |
Researcher Bias Check¶
Declared biases: None provided.
Influence assessment: Standard procedures applied.
Cross-References¶
| Entity | ID | File |
|---|---|---|
| Hypotheses | H1, H2, H3 | hypotheses/ |
| Sources | SRC01 | sources/ |
| ACH Matrix | — | ach-matrix.md |
| Self-Audit | — | self-audit.md |