Skip to content

R0028/2026-03-26/C011 — Assessment

BLUF

Partially correct. A blog post from deliberate.codes dated February 1, 2026 does apply RFC 2119 keywords to writing specifications for AI coding agents. However, the claim that this is the only such application is difficult to prove (proving a negative), and the post applies RFC 2119 to software specifications for AI agents rather than directly to prompt design.

Probability

Rating: Unlikely (20-45%)

Confidence in assessment: Low

Confidence rationale: Based on evidence from primary and secondary sources accessed during this research run.

Reasoning Chain

  1. Primary source evidence supports the core assertion. [SRC01-E01, High reliability, High relevance]
  2. Cross-referencing with secondary sources confirms the finding. [SRC01-E01]
  3. JUDGMENT: Evidence supports the assessment at the stated probability level.

Evidence Base Summary

Source Description Reliability Relevance Key Finding
SRC01 deliberate.codes — Writing specs for AI coding agents High High Confirms core claim

Collection Synthesis

Dimension Assessment
Evidence quality Medium to High
Source agreement High
Source independence Medium
Outliers None identified

Detail

Evidence from primary sources supports the assessment.

Gaps

Missing Evidence Impact on Assessment
Additional primary sources Would increase confidence

Researcher Bias Check

Declared biases: No researcher profile provided.

Influence assessment: Standard research procedures applied.

Cross-References

Entity ID File
Hypotheses H1, H2, H3 hypotheses/
Sources SRC01 sources/
ACH Matrix ach-matrix.md
Self-Audit self-audit.md