R0028/2026-03-26/C001 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: Accurate as stated | H2: Partially correct | H3: Materially wrong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: ABET classic definition contains all five themes | + | ++ | -- |
| SRC01-E02: No joint ABET-IEEE-NSPE document found | -- | ++ | + |
Legend:
- ++ Strongly supports
- + Supports
- -- Strongly contradicts
- - Contradicts
- N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E02 | Absence of joint framework document distinguishes between H1 (exact shared taxonomy) and H2 (overlapping themes) |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Supports both H1 and H2 — the themes exist regardless of whether the taxonomy is formally shared |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H2 — The themes are real and present in all three organizations' materials, but they are not presented as a unified five-element framework.
Hypotheses eliminated: H3 — The themes are clearly identifiable; claiming they are materially wrong is not supported.
Hypotheses inconclusive: H1 — Cannot be fully confirmed without a joint document, but cannot be eliminated either since the themes do appear across all three organizations.