R0023/2026-03-25/Q004 — Self-Audit¶
ROBIS 4-Domain Audit¶
Domain 1: Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Pass
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Evidence criteria defined before searching | Yes — sought published frameworks with defined methodology, distinguishing from vendor product pages |
| Criteria applied consistently | Yes |
Domain 2: Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Some concerns
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Multiple search strategies used | Yes — 3 queries |
| All results dispositioned | Yes — 30 results |
| Source diversity achieved | Limited — vendor guidance, one academic paper, one industry article |
Notes: Academic database searches (ACM DL, IEEE Xplore) were not performed. These might surface additional peer-reviewed work on prompt lifecycle methodology.
Domain 3: Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Pass
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All sources scored using same framework | Yes |
| ACH matrix applied | Yes |
Domain 4: Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Pass
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All hypotheses given fair hearing | Yes |
| Gaps acknowledged | Yes — limited academic coverage noted |
Overall Assessment¶
Overall risk of bias: Low risk
Researcher Bias Check¶
- Absence as evidence risk: The absence of comprehensive frameworks in search results is treated as a finding. However, limited search scope (web search only, no academic database searches) means this absence could reflect search limitations rather than true absence.