R0021/2026-03-25/Q004 — Self-Audit¶
ROBIS 4-Domain Audit¶
Domain 1: Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Criteria defined before searching | Yes — focused on regulatory frameworks in three named industries |
| Criteria stable | Yes |
| Criteria appropriate | Yes |
Domain 2: Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Multiple search strategies | Yes — separate searches per industry |
| All results dispositioned | Yes |
| Source diversity | Yes — four independent regulatory bodies |
Domain 3: Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All sources scored consistently | Yes |
| ACH matrix applied | Yes |
| Diagnosticity analysis performed | Yes |
Domain 4: Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All hypotheses given fair hearing | Yes |
| Contradictory evidence surfaced | Yes — framework limitations acknowledged |
| Gaps acknowledged | Yes |
Overall Assessment¶
Overall risk of bias: Low risk
Researcher Bias Check¶
- Confirmation bias: Researcher benefits from showing regulated industries have frameworks (contrast with prompt engineering). The evidence genuinely supports this finding.