R0007/2026-03-20/C002 — Self-Audit¶
ROBIS 4-Domain Audit¶
Domain 1: Eligibility Criteria¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Evidence types defined before searching | Yes — sought official award documentation |
| Criteria remained stable | Yes |
Notes: Simple factual verification.
Domain 2: Search Comprehensiveness¶
Rating: Some concerns
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Multiple search strategies used | Limited — single search strategy |
| Searches designed to test each hypothesis | Partially — searched for the award, not for evidence it was not given |
| All results dispositioned | Yes |
| Source diversity achieved | Limited — single authoritative source |
Notes: For a binary factual claim about an award, a single authoritative source is arguably sufficient, but broader search would have been ideal.
Domain 3: Evaluation Consistency¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All sources scored using same framework | Yes |
| Evidence typed consistently | Yes |
| ACH matrix applied | Yes |
| Diagnosticity analysis performed | Yes |
Notes: Straightforward application.
Domain 4: Synthesis Fairness¶
Rating: Low risk
| Criterion | Assessment |
|---|---|
| All hypotheses given fair hearing | Yes |
| Contradictory evidence surfaced | None found — absence noted |
| Confidence calibrated to evidence | Yes |
| Gaps acknowledged | Yes |
Notes: No concerns.
Overall Assessment¶
Overall risk of bias: Low risk
Simple factual verification with clear evidence.
Researcher Bias Check¶
- Confirmation bias risk: Low — binary factual claim
- No researcher profile biases relevant to this claim