R0007/2026-03-19/C006 — ACH Matrix¶
Matrix¶
| H1: Claim is accurate as stated | H2: Effect size differs from claim | H3: No such experimental finding exists | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRC01-E01: Primary evidence | ++ | - | -- |
Legend:
- ++ Strongly supports
- + Supports
- -- Strongly contradicts
- - Contradicts
- N/A Not applicable to this hypothesis
Diagnosticity Analysis¶
Most Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| SRC01-E01 | Primary evidence directly addresses the claim's specific assertions |
Least Diagnostic Evidence¶
| Evidence ID | Why Non-Diagnostic |
|---|---|
| N/A | All evidence is diagnostic for this claim |
Outcome¶
Hypothesis supported: H1 — Confirmed. Felps, Mitchell, and Byington (2006) studied 40 groups with planted actors displaying thr
Hypotheses eliminated: H3
Hypotheses inconclusive: None